Publisher logo
Sign Up
Saudi Journal of Radiology
Submit Manuscript
Back to Articles

Computed Tomography Angiograms Performed for Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

Submission Type:Original Research Article

1 Senior Registrar Radiologist, king Fahad hospital in Almadinah almunawarah, Saudi Arabia

2 Consultant Radiologist, king Fahad hospital in Almadinah almunawarah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism is a known condition in the emergency department with high morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a rapid diagnostic tool to detect pulmonary embolism however, the number of positive scans has decreased and the frequency of observed non-embolic findings has increased over time as this tool has been overutilized to provide other alternative diagnoses.

Objective: This study aims to estimate the prevalence of pulmonary embolism and non-embolic findings in patients who underwent CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Design and Setting: In this cross-sectional study we retrospectively analyzed consecutive 158 CTPA images and reports performed for suspected pulmonary embolism at a Saudi tertiary care hospital. The non-embolic findings were classified based on their location.

Results: The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 26.6%. No statistically significant difference was found between the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with respect to gender and age. The prevalence of non-embolic findings among the whole study was 86.7%. Pulmonary findings represented 45.2% of all non-embolic findings followed by pleural findings in 18.3%. Lung opacification and pleural effusion were the most commonly occurring findings.

Conclusion: Relative to other studies our center has a reasonable prevalence of CTPA studies being positive for pulmonary embolism however, we encourage balancing the potential benefits and harms by following a well-structured clinical approach to improve the healthcare quality and safety.

Main Subjects

Training
Radiological Education
Quality Assurance
+4

Keywords

Pulmonary embolism
Computed tomography
Saudi Arabia

License

Journal License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license

issue-coversheet

1, 1st Issue

Pages 36 - 46

Files

Download PDF

Article Insights

Article Views

10

PDF Downloads

0

References

  1. 1.
    Turetz M, Sideris AT, Friedman OA, Triphathi N, Horowitz JM. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and natural history of pulmonary embolism. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018;35(2):92–98.
  2. 2.
    Lee CH, Hankey GJ, Ho WK, Eikelboom JW. Venous thromboembolism: diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism. Med J Aust. 2005;182(11):569–574.
  3. 3.
    Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(22).
  4. 4.
    Perelas A, Dimou A, Saenz A, Rhee JH, Teerapuncharoen K, Rowden A. CT pul- monary angiography utilization in the emergency department: diagnostic yield and adherence to current guidelines. Am J Med Qual. 2015;30(6):571–578.
  5. 5.
    Kooiman J, Klok FA, Mos IC, Molen AVD, Roos AD, Sijpkens YW et al. Incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy following CT-angiography for clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost JTH. 2010;8:409–411.
  6. 6.
    Mamlouk MD, Sonnenberg EV, Gosalia R. Pulmonary embolism at CT angiogra- phy: implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology. 2010;256(2):625–632.
  7. 7.
    Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–2086.
  8. 8.
    Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating Risk of Cancer Associated With Radiation Exposure From 64-Slice Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography. JAMA. 2007;298(3):317–323.
  9. 9.
    Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1228–1233.
  10. 10.
    Chandra S, Sarkar PK, Chandra D, Ginsberg NE, Cohen RI. Finding an alternative diagnosis does not justify increased use of CT-pulmonary angiography. BMC Pulm Med. 2013;13:9–9.
  11. 11.
    Adams DM, Stevens SM, Woller SC. Adherence to PIOPED II investigators’ rec- ommendations for com- puted tomography pulmonary angiography. Am J Med. 2013;126:36–42.
  12. 12.
    Ergönül B, Ayrık C, Köse A, Bozkurt S, Zöhre E, Çevik I. Multislice computed tomog- raphy findings of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: Incidence of pulmonary embolism and non-thromboembolic findings. West Indian Med J. 2015;.
  13. 13.
    Herédia V, Ramalho M, Zapparoli M, Semelka RC. Incidence of pulmonary embolism and other chest findings in younger patients using multidetector computed tomography. Acta Radiol. 2010;51(4):402–408.
  14. 14.
    Es JV, Douma RA, Schreuder SM, Middeldorp S, Kamphuisen PW, Gerdes VE. Clini- cal impact of findings supporting an alternative diagnosis on CT pulmonary angiog- raphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2013;144(6):1893– 1902.
  15. 15.
    Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, Parker LA et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomo- graphic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1961–1966.
  16. 16.
    Perelas A, Dimou A, Saenz A, Rhee JH, Teerapuncharoen K, Rowden A. Incidental findings on computed tomography angiography in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(5):689–95.
  17. 17.
    Rad MP, Tehrani F, Reihani D, H, Sabzevari F, Rajabi SH et al. Incidental findings in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism using computed tomography angiogra- phy. J Cardiol-Thorac Med. 2014;2(2):162–168.
  18. 18.
    Anwar A, Wong S, Muza H, R. Audit on the use of CTPA in pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis. GIMCI. 2017;2(2).
  19. 19.
    Champion N, Hogan S, Flemming J. Assessing the prevalence of incidental findings identified by CTPA in women of reproductive age. Emerg Med Int. 2018;p. 1–5.
  20. 20.
    Anjum O, Bleeker H, Ohle R. Computed tomography for suspected pulmonary embolism results in a large number of non-significant incidental findings and follow- up investigations. Emerg Radiol. 2019;26(1):29–35.
  21. 21.
    Korkut M, Bedel C, Erman K, Yüksel S ; 2019,.
  22. 22.
    Bozorgmehr R, Pishgahi M, Mohaghegh P, Bayat M, Khodadadi P, Ghafori A. Rela- tionship between thrombosis risk factors, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings with pulmonary embolism diagnosis; A cross-sectional study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7:41–41.
  23. 23.
    Haroon Q, Panhwar IA, Zainab R, Anwar S, Kumar A, Nasir S. Prevalence of Non- thromboembolic Incidental Findings on CT Pulmonary Angiography in a Tertiary Care Hospital. AJRMMS [Internet]. 2021;3(1):62–62.
  24. 24.
    Ferreira EV, Gazzana MB, Sarmento MB, Guazzelli PA, Hoffmeister MC, Guerra VA. Alternative diagnoses based on CT angiography of the chest in patients with sus- pected pulmonary thromboembolism. J Bras Pneumol. 2016;42(1):35–41.
  25. 25.
    Richman PB, Courtney DM, Friese J. Prevalence and significance of nonthromboem- bolic findings on chest computed tomography angiography performed to rule out pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study of 1,025 emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:642–649.
  26. 26.
    Pfeil A, Schmidt P, Hermann R, Böttcher J, Wolf G, Hansch A. Parenchymal and pleural findings in pulmonary embolism visualized by multi-channel detector com- puted tomography. Acta Radiol. 2010;51(7):775–81.
  27. 27.
    Cereser L, Bagatto D, Girometti R, Como G, Zuiani C, Bazzocchi M. Chest multide- tector computed tomography in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic yield and proportion of other clinically relevant findings. Radiol Med. 2011;116:219–248.
  28. 28.
    Adibi A, Nouri S, Moradi M, Shahabi J. Clinical and echocardiographic findings of patients with suspected acute pulmonary thromboembolism who underwent com- puted tomography pulmonary angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:118–118.
  29. 29.
     Kornblum J, Daugherty RJ, Bounds R, Vance AZ, Graif A. Diagnostic yield of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolism varies across settings within a community-based health system. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28(2):291–296.
  30. 30.
    Aldridge ES, Rogers IR, Mountain D, Jones P. Establishing an indicator rate for com- puted tomography pulmonary angiography positivity (yield) in emergency depart- ment pulmonary embolism investigation. EMA. 2018;30(1):134–139.
  31. 31.
    Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG. Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investiga- tors. Am J Med. 2006;119(12):1048– 1055.
  32. 32.
    Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S. Guidelines on the diagnosis and manage- ment of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Manage- ment of Acute Pulmonary Embo- lism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2276–2315.