Saudi Journal of Radiology
Sign UpSubmit Manuscript
Saudi Journal of Radiology

Volume 3, 2024 · Issue 1st Issue · Open Access · Double-blind Peer-review

Submit an articleJournal homepage

Original Research Article

Awareness of Interventional Radiology and The Associated Radiation Exposure Risk Among The Public Population and Primary Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia

Maryam Alhashim1

1 King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam, Saudi Arabia

https://doi.org/10.55038/t0h27176
Download PDF
Abstract
Introduction: The imperative for healthcare professionals to possess a comprehensive understanding of radiation doses and the associated risks of the diagnostic imaging processes they recommend is underscored by the evolving landscape of medical diagnostics and treatment. Interventional radiology (IR) plays a crucial role in modern medicine, offering minimally invasive alternatives to traditional surgery. However, public and healthcare practitioner awareness of IR and its associated radiation risks remains inadequately explored, particularly in regions like Saudi Arabia. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the awareness of interventional radiology (IR) and the associated risks of radiological procedures among the general public and healthcare practitioners in Saudi Arabia, identify knowledge gaps, and inform future educational initiatives. Methods: Participants undergoing radiological procedures were selected using a random sampling technique, with stratification based on gender, age, nationality, and education level. The survey, conducted in Saudi Arabia, comprised 48 questions in yes-or-no and multiple-choice formats, covering demographic information, comprehension of interventional radiology, and awareness of radiation exposure risks. Results: Out of 625 respondents, 62.7% had no prior knowledge of IR, and 94.2% had never undergone IR procedures. A significant proportion (55%) lacked information about the radiation exposure associated with IR, and 57.9% perceived risks from radiation in imaging devices. In the post-educational video, 88.2% favoured IR over traditional treatment methods, with 57.8% expressing a willingness to undergo IR procedures in the future. Conclusion: The study reveals a substantial lack of awareness and knowledge about interventional radiology and radiation risks among the Saudi Arabian population and healthcare practitioners. There is a critical need to enhance public and professional understanding of IR to ensure informed decision-making and patient consent, necessitating targeted educational programs to bridge these knowledge gaps.
Keywordsinterventional radiologyAwarenessRadiationexposure risk

License

Journal License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license

References

  1. [1] Morris P, Perkins A. Diagnostic imaging. The Lancet. 2012;379:1525–1533.
  2. [2] Suetens P. Fundamentals of medical imaging; 2017. Cambridge University Press.
  3. [3] Naeem A, Gemal H, Reed D. Imaging in traumatic mandibular fractures. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery. 2017;7:469–469.
  4. [4] Kasban H, El-Bendary M, Salama D. techniques. 2015;4:37–58. A comparative study of medical imaging techniques.
  5. International Journal of Information Science and Intelligent Systems. 2015;4:37–58.[5] Smith NB, Webb A. Introduction to medical imaging: physics, engineering and clinical applications; 2010. Cambridge university press.
  6. [6] Armstrong P, Wastie M, G A. Diagnostic imaging; 2010. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. [7] Heister D, Jackson S, Doherty-Simor M, Newton I. An evaluation of trends in patient and public awareness of IR. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2018;29:661–668.
  8. [8] Chun-Sing W, Bingsheng H, Ho-Kwan S, Wai-Lam W, Ka-Ling Y, Tiffany CYC. A questionnaire study assessing local physicians, radiologists and interns’ knowledge and practice pertaining to radiation exposure related to radiological imaging. European journal of radiology. 2012;81:264–268.
  9. [9] Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, Lu HT, Schueler BA, Geisinger M. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study part I: overall measures of dose. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology. 2003;14:711–727.
  10. [10] Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Puri G, Vellahottam A, Myers A, Andrews K. Awareness of interventional radiology among patients referred to the interventional radiology department: a survey of patients in a large Canadian community hospital. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2007;18:633–634.
  11. [11] Ribeiro A, Husson O, Drey N, Murray I, May K, Thurston J. Ionising radiation
  12. exposure from medical imaging-A review of Patient’s (un) awareness. Radiography. 2020;26:25–30.
  13. [12] Almohiy HM, Hussein K, Alqahtani M, Elshiekh E, Loaz O, Alasmari A. Radiologists’
  14. Knowledge and Attitudes towards CT Radiation Dose and Exposure in Saudi Arabia-A Survey Study. Medical Sciences. 2020;8:27–27.
  15. [13] Maingard J, Kok HK, Ranatunga D, Brooks DM, Chandra RV, Lee MJ. The future
  16. of interventional and neurointerventional radiology: learning lessons from the past. The British journal of radiology. 2017;90:20170473–20170473.
  17. [14] Paolicchi F, Miniati F, Bastiani L, Faggioni L, Ciaramella A, Creonti I. Assessment of radiation protection awareness and knowledge about radiological examination doses among Italian radiographers. Insights into imaging. 2016;7:233–242.